The results of bacterial contamination of dangerous and borderline cases of burns
https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2023.1.CLIN.2
Abstract
The aim is to study the microbiological picture of purulent inflammation of superficial local burns in the center of thermal lesions of Samara.
Material and methods. The etiological structure of local burn infection was analyzed in 29 patients with limited, borderline burns of I-II degree in all phases of the wound process. The collection of wound material was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Methodological Guidelines of MU 4.2.2039-05 "Technique of collecting and transporting biomaterials to microbiological laboratories". The material was delivered to the laboratory in test tubes with a transport medium under isothermal conditions at a temperature of 20–22 °C within a day after collection.
Results. The analysis of the etiological structure of burn infection showed that staphylococcus (St. aureus, St. warneri, St. gallinarium, St. spp, St. epidermidis) plays a leading role in microbiological examination – in 26 patients (89.6 %) and E. coli (E. coli) in 11 (37.9 %). There were no significant differences in the studied signs in the comparison groups (p > 0.05, p = 0.55, χ2 = 3.841).
Conclusion. The obtained results of the etiological structure of purulent inflammation of limited burns are statistically reliable and can be used in the development of antibacterial agents for the treatment of burn infection.
About the Authors
A. V. TolstovRussian Federation
Samara
I. V. Novikov
Russian Federation
Samara
E. S. Milyudin
Russian Federation
Samara
R. R. Yunusov
Russian Federation
Samara
O. I. Kivaeva
Russian Federation
Samara
References
1. 1 Gacto-Sanchez P. Surgical treatment and management of the severely bum patient: Review and update. Med Intensiva. 2017. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.medin.2017.02.008
2. 2 Andreeva TM. Injuries in the Russian Federation on the basis of statistical data. Socialaspectsofpublichealth. 2010;4:16. (In Russ). http://vestnik.mednet.rn/content/view/234/30/lang.ru/
3. 3 VOZ. Vypusknovostey. [News release]. 2017. Dostupenpo: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteriaantibioticsneeded/ru/ (in Russ)]
4. 4 Van Lieshout ЕМ, Van Yperen DT, Van Baar ME, et. al. Epidemiology of injuries, treatment (costs) and outcome in bum patients admitted to a hospital with or without dedicated bum centre (Bum-Pro): protocol for a multicentreprospective observational study. BMJOpen. 2018 Nov 15;8(1 l):e023709. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023709
5. 5 Petriuk B.V., Sydorchuk R.I., Khomko O.Y., Sydorchuk L.P., Petriuk T.A., Khomko B.O. The Canges of Burned Wounds Microbiocenosis Under Intratissue Electrophoresis of Antibacterial Remedies. European J. of Medicine. 2015;7(1):29–33.
6. 6 CordtsТ, Horter J, Vogelpohl J, Kremer T, Kneser U, Hemekamp JF. Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences. BMC Dermatol. 2016;16:8. Published online 2016 Jun 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/sl2895- 016-0045-2
7. 7 Kirik O.V., Nightingale P.O., Masliy Y.O. Infection and control of a burn wound. Hospital surgery. 1999;4:30–33. (In Russ).
8. 8 Kolsanov AV, Tolstov AV, Voronin AS. Morphological features of healing of skin defects in the application of wound phytopoints in the experiment. Morphology. 2012;141:80. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Tolstov A.V., Novikov I.V., Milyudin E.S., Yunusov R.R., Kivaeva O.I. The results of bacterial contamination of dangerous and borderline cases of burns. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2023;13(1):51-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2023.1.CLIN.2