Possibilities of instrumental diagnostic methods for visualizing the pubic periosteum in the femoral canal
https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.2.CLIN.1
Abstract
Performing classical methods of plasty in patients with femoral hernia is possible if Cooper's ligament – the pubic periosteum – is preserved. Patients with a long history of femoral hernia develop thinning and atrophy of the pubic periosteum. The aim of the study was to establish the possibilities of instrumental research methods to determine the preservation or atrophy of the pubic periosteum in patients with femoral hernia. It was found that using the X-ray method and CT before the operation, it was not possible to establish the preservation or atrophy of the pubic periosteum in the area of the femoral canal. With ultrasound, it is possible to visualize the pubic periosteum in young patients.
About the Authors
V. I. BelokonevRussian Federation
Samara
S. Yu. Pushkin
Russian Federation
Samara
Z. V. Kovaleva
Russian Federation
Samara
N. S. Burnaeva
Russian Federation
Samara
A. V. Zharov
Russian Federation
Samara
References
1. Belokonev V.I., Zharov A.G. Osobennosti khirurgicheskogo lecheniya patsientov s neoslozhnennoy bedrennoy gryzhey. Novosti khirurgii. 2019;27(2): 146-152. (In Russ).
2. Vesnin A.G., Semenov I.I. Atlas luchevoy diagnostiki opukholey oporno-dvigatel nogo apparata. ʹ Saint Petersburg; 2002. 182 р. (In Russ).
3. Zegdenidze G.A. Klinicheskaya rentgenoradiologiya. Rukovodstvo v 5 tomah. Moscow: Meditsina; 1984. (In Russ).
4. Sherman L.A., Buachidze O.Sh. Kompleksnaya luchevaya diagnostika pervichnykh opukholey kostey. Ehksperimental naya onkologiya. ʹ 2000;22:231-234. (In Russ).
5. Burstein F.D., Canalis R.F., Canalis E.M. et al. Scanning electron microscopy and gel electrophoresis of vascularized periosteal autografts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1989;83:500-510.
6. Carlos Henrique Maia Ferreira Alencar, Claudio Regis Sampaio Silveira, Matheus Martins Cavalcante Periosteum: An imaging review. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020 27;7:100249. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7. Dwek J.R. The periosteum: what is it, where is it, and what mimics it in its absence? Sceletal Radiol. 2010; 39:319-323.
8. Erickson S.J. High – resolution imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiology.1997;205:593-618.
9. Hoffman D.F., Adams E., Bianchi S. Ultrasonography of fractures in sports medicine. Br. J. Sports Med. 2015;49:152-160.
10. Ines L.H. Reichert, Michael Benjamin, Peter D Gatehouse et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of periosteum with ultrashort TE pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jan;19(1):99-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10432
11. Jee W.S., Cowin S. Bone Integrated bone tissue physiology: anatomy and physiology. Mechanics Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton7, 2001.
12. Kazanci M., Roschger P., Paschalis E.P., Klaushofer K., Fratzl P. Bone osteonal tissues by Raman spectral mapping: orientation-composition. J Struct Biol. 2006 Dec;156(3):489-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Jul 16. PMID: 16931054.
13. Mandair G.S., Morris M.D. Contributions of Raman spectroscopy to the understanding of bone strength. Bonekey Rep. 2015 Jan 7;4:620. https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2014.115. PMID: 25628882; PMCID: PMC4296861.
14. Moraux A.D., Gitto S., Bianchi S. Ultrasound Features of the Normal and Pathologic Periosteum. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Mar;38(3):775-784. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14762
15. Rana R.S., Wu J.S., Eisenberg R. L. Periosteal reaction. AJR Am.J. Roentgenol. 2009;193(4):W259-72.
16. Wheater P.R., Gurkitt H.G., Daniesls V.G. Functional Histology, Churchill Livingstone. New York; 1987. 149 p.
Review
For citations:
Belokonev V.I., Pushkin S.Yu., Kovaleva Z.V., Burnaeva N.S., Zharov A.V. Possibilities of instrumental diagnostic methods for visualizing the pubic periosteum in the femoral canal. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2021;(2):33-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.2.CLIN.1