Influence of pH on the dynamics of the wound process in the postoperative period
https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.2.CLIN.9
Abstract
The wound process is a set of stages that successively replace each other and as a result lead to epithelization of the skin and closure of the wound defect. The development of the wound process is influenced by the pH value of the wound contents, which determines the rate of all biochemical reactions occurring in the wound. In the course of the study, patients were measured for wound exudate in the postoperative period. It was noted that in patients with the initial values of the hydrogen index, which was 7, a more effective healing process of the postoperative wound was observed, while in patients with the initial pH value of 8, the wound process took a protracted character.
About the Authors
А. М. MorozovRussian Federation
Tver
А. R. Armasov
Russian Federation
Tver
А. N. Sergeev
Russian Federation
Tver
S. V. Zhukov
Russian Federation
Tver
Е. А. Sobol
Russian Federation
Tver
М. М. Muravlyantseva
Russian Federation
Tver
М. А. Belyak
Russian Federation
Tver
References
1. Alekseeva N.T., Nikityuk D.B., Klochkova S.V. Analiticheskaya morfologiya reparativnoj regeneracii v kozhe pod dejstviem razlichnyh regional'nyh faktorov. ZHurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. 2015;4(1):26-27. (In Russ).
2. Andreev A.A., Gluhov A.A., Ostroushko A.P., Karapit'yan A.R., CHuyan A.O. Vliyanie kislotnosti na dinamiku reparativnyh processov v myagkih tkanyah. Vestnik eksperimental'noj i klinicheskoj hirurgii. 2017;10(1):64-71. https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-478X2017-10-1-64-71 (In Russ).
3. Andreev A.A., Karpuhin A.G., Frolov R.N. et al. Primenenie gidrolizata kollagena i gidroimpul'snoj sanacii v lechenii eksperimental'nyh gnojnyh ran. Vestnik eksperimental'noj i klinicheskoj hirurgii. 2014;4(7): 378-387. (In Russ).
4. Andreev A.A., Gluhov A.A., CHerednikov E.F. et al. Reparativnaya regeneraciya ran myagkih tkanej s ispol'zovaniem kislotomodificirovannyh rastvorov v eksperimente. Materialy XXIII s"ezda fiziologicheskogo obshchestva im. I. P. Pavlova s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. 2017:2606-2608. (In Russ).
5. Borisov V.S., Kaplunova M.YU., Titova G.P. et al. Sluchaj uspeshnogo lecheniya dlitel'no nezazhivayushchej posleozhogovoj rany. Trudnyj pacient. 2016;14(10-11):56-58. (In Russ).
6. Vinnik YU.S., Markelova N.M., Tyuryumin V.S. Sovremennye metody lecheniya gnojnyh ran. Sibirskoe medicinskoe obozrenie. 2013;1:8-22. (In Russ).
7. Mohov E.M., Kadykov V.A., Sergeev A.N. et al. Ocenochnye shkaly boli i osobennosti ih primeneniya v medicine (obzor literatury). Verhnevolzhskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2019;18(2):34-37. eLIBRARY ID: 39150293. (In Russ).
8. Olifirova O.S., Kozka A.A.. Vozmozhnosti optimizacii lecheniya ran razlichnogo geneza. Dal'nevostochnyj medicinskij zhurnal. 2018;3:5-9. (In Russ).
9. Trufanova E.A. Prostoj indikatornyj metod opredeleniya rH kak sposob ocenki sostoyaniya hronicheskoj ekssudiruyushchej rany. Molodoj uchenyj. 2019;36(274):30-33. (In Russ).
10. Cherkasov M.F., Galashokyan K.M., Lukash A.I. et al. Lechenie ran razlichnoj etiologii s primeneniem vakuum-terapii. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019;6:136. (In Russ).
11. Percival S.L., McCarty S. et al. The effects of pH on wound healing, biofolms, and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2014;22:174-186. (In Russ).
12. Fife C.E., Carter M.J. et al. Wound Care Outcomes and Associated Cost Among Patients Treated in US Outpatient Wound Centers: Data From the US Wound Registry. Wounds. 2012;24(1):10-17. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Morozov А.М., Armasov А.R., Sergeev А.N., Zhukov S.V., Sobol Е.А., Muravlyantseva М.М., Belyak М.А. Influence of pH on the dynamics of the wound process in the postoperative period. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2021;(2):87-91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.2.CLIN.9