MODERN ASPECTS OF THE DIAGNOSIS OF SEVERE COMBINED TRAUMA USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.3.CLIN.3
Abstract
Relevance. The variety of options for combining injuries and disorders occurring in the body with a combined injury, the need for rapid decision-making on treatment require rapid diagnosis of the entire volume of injuries and determining the severity of the injury, but there is still no single protocol for examining such victims.
The aim of the work was to present a modern CT study protocol for patients with concomitant trauma.
Materials and methods. The results of computed tomography of 30 patients with severe concomitant trauma were analyzed. All the victims were admitted in the first hours after the injury. Men were 30 (67 %), women – 10 (33 %), the average age was 41.3 ± 7.6 (22–79) years. Traditional multiphase full-body MSCT was performed in 20 patients, in 10 patients a special protocol was used for the study of the "whole body" by the method of divided bolus.
The results of the study. Craniocerebral injuries were detected in 15 (50 %), spinal injuries – in 7 (23.3 %). Simultaneous injuries to the chest and abdomen were detected in 19 (63.3 %) of the victims. When subjectively evaluated, the quality of the images obtained using the full-body MSCT protocol with bolus separation and the standard multiphase protocol for the diagnosis of traumatic injuries was equivalent. The average radiation load per patient with traditional multiphase full-body MSCT is 66 % higher than with the split-bolus protocol.
Conclusions. Full-body MSCT using a split bolus is a modern technique that fully meets the diagnostic conditions for severe combined trauma and, with a decrease in the radiation dose, allows you to determine all possible injuries in the victim in a single study.
About the Authors
I. E. Popova
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Ambulance
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
L. T. Khamidova
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Ambulance
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
R. S. Muslimov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Ambulance
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
T. G. Barmina
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Ambulance
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. A. Badigov
N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Ambulance
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Rüden C., Woltmann A., Röse M., Wurm S., Rüger M., Hierholzer C., Bühren V. Out·some after severe multiple trauma: a retrospective analysis. J Trauma Manag Out·somes 2013; 7(1): 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-7-4.
2. Paffrath T., Lefering R., Flohé S.; Trauma Register DGU. How to define severely injured patients? — An Injury Severity Score (ISS) based approach alone is not sufficient. Injury 2014; 45(Suppl 3): S64–S69, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.020
3. Shojaee M, Faridaalaee G. et al. New scoring system for intraabdominal injury diagnosis after blunt trauma. Chin J Traumatol 2014; 17 (1): 19–24
4. Skoraya meditsinskaya pomoshch’: natsional’noye rukovodstvo / red. S. F. Bagnenko, M. Sh. Khubutiya, A. G. Miroshnichenko. – Moskva: G·EOTAR-Media, 2015. – 886 s.
5. Nazinkina, Yu.V. Glava 4. Luchevaya diagnostika cherepno-mozgovoy travmy / Yu.V. Nazinkina, T.N. Trofimova, G.N. Dorovskikh // Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya zabolevaniy golovy i shei: natsional’noye rukovodstvo / gl. red. toma T. N. Trofimova. – M. : G·EOTAR-Media, 2013. – 888 s. – (Natsional’noye rukovodstvo po luchevoy diagnostike i terapii),
6. Dorovskikh, G.N. Luchevaya diagnostika sochetannoy travmy golovy i organov grudnoy kletki / G.N. Dorovskikh // Byulleten’ Sibirskoy meditsiny. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 108–118.
7. Myuller Z. Neotlozhnaya pomoshch’: spravochnik prakticheskogo vracha / Z. Myuller; per. s nem. [M. I. Sekacheva]. - 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. - Moskva : MEDpress-inform, 2009. - 527 s.: il.; 22 sm.; ISBN 5-98322-367-4 Orig.: Müller, Sönke Memorix Notfallmedizin 7., neubearb. Aufl. Stuttgart ; New York : Georg Thieme Verlag, 2005 3-13-139937-6
8. Wintermark M., Poletti P.A., Becker C.D., Schnyder P. Traumatic injuries: organization and ergonomics of imaging in the emergency environment. Eur Radiol. 2002 May;12(5):959-68. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1385-3. Epub 2002 Mar 15. PMID: 11976840.
9. Luchevaya diagnostika organov grudnoy kletki: natsional’noye rukovodstvo / glav. red. serii S.K. Ternovoy; glav. red. toma V.N. Troyan, A.I. Shekhter.- M.: G·EOTAR-Media, 2014
10. Heyer C.M. et al. Prospective randomized trial of a modified standard multislice CT protocol for the evaluation of multiple trauma patients. Rofo 2005 Feb; 177 (2): 242-9.
11. Jiang L., Ma Y., Jiang S., Ye L., Zheng Z., Xu Y., Zhang M. Comparison of whole-body computed tomography vs selective radiological imaging on out·somes in major trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Sep 2;22:54. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0054-2. PMID: 25178942; PMCID: PMC4347587.
12. Lichtenstein D.A. Lung Ultrasound in the Critically Ill. The BLUE Protocol. Cham: Springer, 2016. 376 p. ISBN 978-3-319-15371-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-4-1
13. Anderson S.W., Lucey B.C., Varghese J.C., Soto J.A. Sixty-four multi-detector row computed tomography in multitrauma patient imaging: early experience. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):188-98. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2006.06.004. PMID: 16949475.
14. Salim A., Sangthong B., Martin M., Brown C., Plurad D., Demetriades D. Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: results of a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2006 May;141(5):468-73; discussion 473-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.468. PMID: 16702518.
15. Sampson M.A., Colquhoun K.B., Hennessy N.L. Computed tomography whole body imaging in multi-trauma: 7 years experience. Clin Radiol. 2006 Apr;61(4):365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.12.009. PMID: 16546467.
16. Wedegärtner U, Lorenzen M, Nagel HD, Weber C, Adam G. Radiologische Bildgebung beim Polytrauma: Dosisvergleich von Ganzkörper-MSCT und konventionellem Röntgen mit organspezifischer CT [Diagnostic imaging in polytrauma: comparison of radiation exposure from whole-body MSCT and conventional radiography with organ-specific CT]. Rofo. 2004 Jul;176(7):1039-44. German. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813216. PMID: 15237348.
17. Linsenmaier U., Krötz M., Häuser H., Rock C., Rieger J., Bohndorf K., Pfeifer K.J., Reiser M. Whole-body computed tomography in polytrauma: techniques and management. Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12(7):1728-40. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1225-x. Epub 2001 Dec 13. PMID: 12111064.
18. Surendran A., Mori A., Varma D.K., Gruen R.L. Systematic review of the benefits and harms of whole-body computed tomography in the early management of multitrauma patients: are we getting the whole picture? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Apr;76(4):1122-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000178. PMID: 24662881.
19. Gordic S., Alkadhi H., Hodel S., Simmen H.P., Brueesch M., Frauenfelder T., Wanner G., Sprengel K. Whole-body CT-based imaging algorithm for multiple trauma patients: radiation dose and time to diagnosis. Br J Radiol. 2015 Mar;88(1047):20140616. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140616. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PMID: 25594105; PMCID: PMC4651196.
20. Bayer J., Pache G., Strohm P.C., Zwingmann J., Blanke P., Baumann T., Südkamp N.P., Hammer T. Influence of arm positioning on radiation dose for whole body computed tomography in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):900-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181edc80e
Review
For citations:
Popova I.E., Khamidova L.T., Muslimov R.S., Barmina T.G., Badigov S.A. MODERN ASPECTS OF THE DIAGNOSIS OF SEVERE COMBINED TRAUMA USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2021;(3):28-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2021.3.CLIN.3
Views:
1213
Email this article 