Comparative analysis of separation techniques in the treatment of medial ventral hernias
https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2024.2.CLIN.5
Abstract
Relevance. Tension-free herniolasty of the anterior abdominal wall is currently the accepted standard for large ventral hernia repairing. The implementation of this approach has been marked by a significant improvement in treatment outcomes. The issues of improving the quality of life of patients after surgery and their effective rehabilitation through the application of the optimal technique of tension-free hernioplasty are now at the forefront.
Objective. To compare the immediate and long-term results of treatment of patients with large postoperative midline ventral hernias using anterior and posterior techniques of separation of abdominal wall components.
Object and methods. 114 patients with large postoperative midline ventral hernias were divided into two groups: the patients of the first group (38 patients) underwent hernioplasty using the anterior separation technique, and the patients of the second group (76 patients) - posterior separation. We evaluated the immediate (complications in the area of surgery, duration of surgical wound drainage and duration of hospitalization) and long-term (functional restoration of the abdominal wall) results of treatment with subsequent comparative analysis of data between the groups using descriptive statistics methods.
Results. The present study is the first to compare the immediate and long-term results of using anterior and posterior techniques for separation of anterior abdominal wall components during surgery for midline ventral hernias. It was found that both variants demonstrate good immediate and long-term results in the treatment of patients with median postoperative ventral hernias of large size. At the same time, the anterior separation technique is accompanied by a significantly higher number of complications and, accordingly, is characterized by a higher risk of their development, as well as requires a longer stay of the patient in the hospital.
About the Authors
E. A. StolyarovRussian Federation
Evgeniy A. Stolyarov, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of General Surgery
89, Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
B. D. Grachev
Russian Federation
Boris D. Grachev, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of General Surgery and Surgical Diseases
89, Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
D. G. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Denis G. Alekseev, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of General Surgery and Surgical Diseases
89, Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
M. A. Bezrukova
Russian Federation
Mariya A. Bezrukova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of General Surgery and Surgical Diseases
89, Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
I. V. Ishutov
Russian Federation
Igor' V. Ishutov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases, Chief physician of the Multidisciplinary Clinic "Reaviz"
227, Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443001
References
1. 1 Parshikov V.V., Loginov V.I. Technique of separation of abdominal wall components in the treatment of patients with ventral and postoperative hernias (review). Modern technologies in medicine. 2016;8(1):183-1 94. (In Russ). http://dx.doi.Org/10.17691/stm2016.8.1.24
2. 2 Egiev V.N., Voskresensky P.K. Hernias. Moscow: Medpraktika- M; 2015:480. (In Russ).
3. 3 Belokonev V.I., Ponomareva Yu.V., Pushkin S.Yu., Kovaleva Z.V., Gubsky V.M., Terekhin A.A. Anterior prosthetic hernia repair by combined method for large and giant ventral hernias. Surgery. The magazine named after N.I. Pirogov. 2018;(5):45-50. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018545-50
4. 4 Nikolsky V.I. et al. To study the quality of life of patients after prosthetic hernioplasty. Surgery news. 2016;24(1):19-25.
5. 5 Belokonev V.I., Pushkin S.Yu., Kovaleva Z.V., Ponomareva Yu.V., Gulyaev M.G. Etiology, pathogenesis and treatment of recurrent postoperative ventral hernias. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2023:135. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1058965
6. 6 Ramirez O.M., Ruas E., Dellon A.L. Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1 990;86(3):519-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-19900900000023
7. 7 Borodin I.F., Skobey E.V., Akulik V.P. Surgery of postoperative abdominal hernias. Minsk, Belarus;1986:87.
8. 8 Novitsky Y.W., Elliott H.L., Orenstein S.B., Rosen M.J. Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component sepa¬ration during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2012;204(5):709-71 6. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.008
9. 9 Pat. 2123292 Russian Federation, IPC7 A61B 17/00. The method of hernioplasty for median abdominal hernias / Belokonev V.I., Belousov D.V., Alexandrov I.K., Grachev B.D., Makhova A.N.; applicant and patent holder Samara State Medical University named after D.I. Ulyanov. No. 95108583/14; application no. 05/25/95; publ. 12/20/98. 5 p. (In Russ).
10. 10 Sapieva S.T., Abatov N.T., Asamidanov E.M., Badyrov R.M., Abatova A.N., Shokan R.K. Systemic inflammatory re¬sponse in hernioplasty. Bulletin of KazNMU. 2020;1:345-348. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistemnyy-vospalitelnyy-otvet-pri-gernioplastike (date of application: 08.01.2024). (In Russ).
11. 11 Chernykh A.V., Zakurdaev E.I., Cherednikov E.F., Yakusheva N.V., Vitchinkin V.G., Zakurdaeva M.P., Maleev Yu.V. A method for the prevention of intraoperative traumatization of intercostal nerves during herniation for umbilical hernias. Health news. 2017;1:20-24. (In Russ). http://dx.doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2017.1.20
Review
For citations:
Stolyarov E.A., Grachev B.D., Alekseev D.G., Bezrukova M.A., Ishutov I.V. Comparative analysis of separation techniques in the treatment of medial ventral hernias. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2024;14(2):35-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2024.2.CLIN.5