Anaphylaxis in obstetrics: a literature review and own clinical observation
https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2026.2.CASE.1
Abstract
Background. Anaphylactic shock in obstetrics is a rare but potentially life-threatening cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, largely determined by the specific immunological alterations occurring during pregnancy.
Case presentation. We report a case of anaphylactic shock developing after administration of cefotaxime as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, resulting in a fatal maternal outcome. The causative agent was a cephalosporin capable of inducing cross-allergic reactions with penicillins.
Conclusion. Thorough allergological history-taking and careful assessment of comorbidities in pregnant patients may not entirely prevent anaphylaxis, but can substantially reduce its severity and consequences.
About the Authors
D. N. BelozerovaRussian Federation
Dar'ya N. Belozerova - First-year resident, Department of Forensic Medicine and Medical Law, Faculty of Training and Advanced Studies for Civilian Medical (Pharmaceutical) Specialists
Klinicheskaya St., 6, St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Yu. P. Panchuk
Russian Federation
Yuriy Petrovich Panchuk - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of Department of Forensic Medicine and Medical Law
Klinicheskaya St., 6, St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. K. Tamberg
Russian Federation
Dmitriy K. Tamberg - Lecturer, Department of Forensic Medicine and Medical Law
Klinicheskaya St., 6, St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
T. E. Kurmanbaev
Russian Federation
Timur E. Kurmanbaev - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Klinicheskaya St., 6, St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Z. N. Degtyareva
Russian Federation
Zoya N. Degtyareva - Obstetrician-gynecologist
Demyana Bednogo St., 71, Novosibirsk, 630005, Russia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. T. Nurmukhametova
Russian Federation
Elmira T. Nurmukhametova - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Course in Endoscopic Surgery
Chapaevskaya St., 227, Samara, 443001, Russia
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Adamyan L.V., Bayalieva A.Zh., Belokrinitskaya T.E., Zabolotskikh I.B., Kulikov A.V., Lebedinsky K.M., et al. Anaphylactic shock in obstetrics. V.F. Snegirev’s Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;4(2):93–102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/2313-8726-2017-4-2-93-102
2. Watanabe K., Najid N. M., Mazda Y. Successful management of anaphylactic shock prior to elective cesarean delivery: a case report. JA Clinical Reports. 2024;10(1):67. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s40981-024-00750-z
3. McCall S.J., Bunch K.J., Brocklehurst P., D'Arcy R., Hinshaw K., Kurinczuk J.J., et al. The incidence, characteristics, management and outcomes of anaphylaxis in pregnancy: a population‐based descriptive study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;125(8):965-971. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1471-0528.15041
4. Ilenkova N. A., Stepanova L. V., Sergienko D. F. Early symptoms of atopy – as a factor in the implementation of the atopic march on the example of a clinical case. Lechaschi Vrach. 2022;(5-6):34-38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2022.25.6.006
5. Dutra K.J., Lazenby G.B., Goje O., Soper D.E. Cefazolin as the mainstay for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with a penicillin allergy in obstetrics and gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024;231(4):430-436. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.019
6. Almeida J.P., Lopes A., Campos Melo A., Pereira Santos M.C., Pereira Barbosa M. Selective hypersensitivity to cefazolin and contribution of the basophil activation test. European Annals of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2017;49(2):84-87.
7. Singleton births, delivery by cesarean section. Clinical recommendations. Moscow: Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2024:94. (In Russ.)
8. Khan R., Anastasakis E., Kadir R.A. Anaphylactic reaction to ceftriaxone in labour. An emerging complication. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2008;28(7):751-753. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01443610802260595
9. Chaudhuri K., Gonzales J., Jesurun C.A., Ambat M.T., Mandal-Chaudhuri S. Anaphylactic shock in pregnancy: a case study and review of the literature. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2008;17(4):350-357. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.05.002
10. Ilyina N.I., Zabolotskikh I.B., Astafieva N.G., Bayalieva A.Zh., Kulikov A.V., Latysheva T.V., Lebedinsky K.M., Musaeva T.S., Myasnikova T.N., Pampura A.N., Fassakhov R.S., Shifman E.M. Anaphylactic shock (2nd revision). Clinical guidelines of the Russian Association of Allergists and Clinical Immunologists and the AllRussian Public Organization "Federation of Anesthesiologists and Resuscitators". Annals of Critical Care. 2024;(2):7–20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/ 10.21320/1818-474X-2024-2-7-20.
Review
For citations:
Belozerova D.N., Panchuk Yu.P., Tamberg D.K., Kurmanbaev T.E., Degtyareva Z.N., Nurmukhametova E.T. Anaphylaxis in obstetrics: a literature review and own clinical observation. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2026;16(2):159-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2026.2.CASE.1
JATS XML


















