Evaluation of the prospects for developing a next-generation perfusion solution for hypothermic oxygenated preservation of donor organs
https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2025.6.TX.3
Abstract
Background. Ischemia-reperfusion injury remains a central challenge in clinical transplantology, determining outcomes particularly when using organs from expanded criteria donors and donors after circulatory death. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) has established itself as an effective strategy for donor organ protection; however, existing preservation solutions (UW, HTK) were developed for static cold storage and are not optimized for oxygenated perfusion conditions. Current understanding of pathogenesis has revealed the key role of reverse electron transport in mitochondria and ferroptosis — mechanisms not addressed by classical solutions.
Aim. To analyze approaches to developing a next-generation universal perfusion solution (MITOPERF) optimized for protection against key mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury: oxidative stress, mitochondrial reverse electron transport, ferroptosis, and inflammatory response.
Materials and methods. An experimental perfusion solution MITOPERF was developed, containing 18 pharmacologically active components with multitarget action: mitochondrial protectors, antioxidants, antiferroptotic agents, immunomodulators, and energy substrates. The study was performed on 36 male Wistar rats (18 — liver model, 18 — kidney model). Animals were randomized into groups: Custodiol (control), MITOPERF, and modified Custodiol ex tempore (Custodiol-M). We modeled 30-minute warm ischemia (DCD conditions), 2-hour hypothermic oxygenated perfusion, and 60-minute normothermic reperfusion. Biochemical injury markers (ALT, AST, creatinine, lactate), ferroptosis markers (4-HNE, GPX4), functional parameters (bile production, glomerular filtration rate), and histological changes were evaluated.
Results. MITOPERF provided a 76% reduction in ALT (169±91 vs 694±247 U/L, p<0.05) and 64% reduction in creatinine (121±46 vs 334±97 μmol/L, p<0.05) compared to control. The ferroptosis marker 4-HNE concentration decreased more than 2-fold, GPX4 activity increased nearly 2-fold. Bile production in the MITOPERF group exceeded control by 2.4 times (0.74±0.24 vs 0.31±0.15 μL/min/g, p<0.05), glomerular filtration rate — by 3.2 times (0.76±0.29 vs 0.24±0.12 mL/min/g, p<0.05). Modified Custodiol-M showed intermediate protective effect (43–55% reduction in injury markers).
Conclusion. The experimental solution MITOPERF demonstrated proof of concept for effective protection of parenchymal organs from ischemia-reperfusion injury during hypothermic oxygenated preservation. Comparable protection of liver and kidney confirms action on universal pathogenetic mechanisms. Modified Custodiol ex tempore may be recommended for clinical implementation as an accessible alternative not requiring new drug registration.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. S. NovruzbekovRussian Federation
Murad S. Novruzbekov. Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Surgeon, Head of the Research Department; Head of the Department of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after V.P. Demikhov; rofessor, Department of Surgical Diseases
Bolshaya Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
Ostrovityanova St., 1, Moscow, 117513
Kashirskoe shosse, 23, Moscow, 115522
Krasnobogatyrskaya str., 2, building 2, Moscow, 107564
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no competing interests. B.I. Yaremin is the executive secretary of the journal's editorial board, M.S. Novruzbekov is a member of the journal's editorial board, and O.N. Pavlova is the journal's scientific editor. The authors did not participate in the decision to publish the work.
B. I. Yaremin
Russian Federation
Boris I. Yaremin. Cand. Sci. (Med.), surgeon, researcher; Associate Professor; Head of the Department of Surgical Diseases
Bolshaya Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
Ostrovityanova St., 1, Moscow, 117513
Kashirskoe shosse, 23, Moscow, 115522
Krasnobogatyrskaya str., 2, building 2, Moscow, 107564
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no competing interests. B.I. Yaremin is the executive secretary of the journal's editorial board, M.S. Novruzbekov is a member of the journal's editorial board, and O.N. Pavlova is the journal's scientific editor. The authors did not participate in the decision to publish the work.
A. G. Balkarov
Russian Federation
Aslan G. Balkarov. Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Research Department; Associate Professor, V.P. Demikhov Department of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
Bolshaya Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
Ostrovityanova St., 1, Moscow, 117513
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no competing interests. B.I. Yaremin is the executive secretary of the journal's editorial board, M.S. Novruzbekov is a member of the journal's editorial board, and O.N. Pavlova is the journal's scientific editor. The authors did not participate in the decision to publish the work.
B. I. Kazymov
Russian Federation
Bakhtiyar I. Kazymov. Surgeon, Researcher; Assistant Professor, Department of Surgical Diseases
Bolshaya Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
Kashirskoe shosse, 23, Moscow, 115522
Krasnobogatyrskaya str., 2, building 2, Moscow, 107564
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no competing interests. B.I. Yaremin is the executive secretary of the journal's editorial board, M.S. Novruzbekov is a member of the journal's editorial board, and O.N. Pavlova is the journal's scientific editor. The authors did not participate in the decision to publish the work.
P. O. Svischeva
Russian Federation
Polina O. Svischeva. Pathologist
Bolshaya Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no competing interests. B.I. Yaremin is the executive secretary of the journal's editorial board, M.S. Novruzbekov is a member of the journal's editorial board, and O.N. Pavlova is the journal's scientific editor. The authors did not participate in the decision to publish the work.
O. N. Pavlova
Russian Federation
Ol'ga N. Pavlova. Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Head of the Department of Physiology; Professor of the Department of Morphology and Pathology
Chapaevskaya St., 89, Samara, 443099
Chapaevskaya St., 227, Samara, 443001
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no competing interests. B.I. Yaremin is the executive secretary of the journal's editorial board, M.S. Novruzbekov is a member of the journal's editorial board, and O.N. Pavlova is the journal's scientific editor. The authors did not participate in the decision to publish the work.
S. M. Khanova
Russian Federation
Safiya M. Khanova. Clinical Resident
Bolshaya Sukharevskaya Square, 3, Moscow, 129090
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no competing interests. B.I. Yaremin is the executive secretary of the journal's editorial board, M.S. Novruzbekov is a member of the journal's editorial board, and O.N. Pavlova is the journal's scientific editor. The authors did not participate in the decision to publish the work.
References
1. Shabunin A.V., Loran O.B., Pushkar D.Yu., Veliev E.I., Minina M.G., Drozdov P.A., Astapovich S.A., Lidzhieva E.A. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion in liver transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2024;26(2):63-72. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2024-2-63-72
2. Gautier S.V., Grudinin N.V., Monakhov A.R., Boldyrev M.A., Bogdanov V.K., Bondarenko D.M., Zubenko S.I., Mozheiko N.P., Minina M.G., Tsirulnikova O.M. Combined sequential hypothermic oxygenated and normothermic machine perfusion for liver transplant from an expanded criteria donor: first clinical application in Russia. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2025;27(2):8-22. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2025-2-8-22
3. van Rijn R., Schurink I.J., de Vries Y. et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion in liver transplantation — a randomized trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021; 384(15):1391–1401.
4. Czigany Z., Pratschke J., Froněk J. et al. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion reduces early allograft injury and improves posttransplant outcomes in extended criteria donation liver transplantation from donation after brain death: Results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (HOPE ECD-DBD). Ann. Surg. 2021;274(5):705–712.
5. Ravaioli M., Germinario G., Dajti G. et al. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion in extended criteria donor liver transplantation — A randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Transplant. 2022;22(10):2401–2408.
6. Dutkowski P., Schlegel A., de Oliveira M. et al. HOPE for human liver grafts obtained from donors after cardiac death. J. Hepatol. 2014;60(4):765–772.
7. Schlegel A., Muller X., Kalisvaart M. et al. Outcomes of DCD liver transplantation using organs treated by hypothermic oxygenated perfusion before implantation. J. Hepatol. 2019;70(1):50–57.
8. Kron P., Schlegel A., de Rougemont O. et al. Short, cool, and well oxygenated — HOPE for kidney transplantation in a rodent model. Ann. Surg. 2016;264(5):815–822.
9. Chouchani E.T., Pell V.R., Gaude E. et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature. 2014;515(7527):431–435.
10. Murphy E., Steenbergen C. Mechanisms underlying acute protection from cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. Physiol. Rev. 2008;88(2):581–609.
11. Yellon D.M., Hausenloy D.J. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357(11):1121–1135.
12. Stockwell B.R., Friedmann Angeli J.P., Bayir H. et al. Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 2017;171(2):273–285.
13. Dixon S.J., Lemberg K.M., Lamprecht M.R. et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149(5):1060–1072.
14. Yang W.S., SriRamaratnam R., Welsch M.E. et al. Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4. Cell. 2014;156(1-2):317–331.
15. Friedmann Angeli J.P., Schneider M., Proneth B. et al. Inactivation of the ferroptosis regulator Gpx4 triggers acute renal failure in mice. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014;16(12):1180–1191.
16. Linkermann A., Skouta R., Himmerkus N. et al. Synchronized renal tubular cell death involves ferroptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111(47):16836–16841.
17. Southard J.H., Belzer F.O. Organ preservation. Annu. Rev. Med. 1995;46):235–247.
18. Bretschneider H.J. Myocardial protection. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1980;28(5):295–302.
19. Belzer F.O., Southard J.H. Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage. Transplantation. 1988;45(4):673–676.
20. Ben Mosbah I., Roselló-Catafau J., Franco-Gou R. et al. Preservation of steatotic livers in IGL-1 solution. Liver Transpl. 2006;12(8):1215–1223.
21. Schlegel A., Graf R., Clavien P.A., Dutkowski P. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) protects from biliary injury in a rodent model of DCD liver transplantation. J. Hepatol. 2013;59(5):984–991.
22. Eltzschig H.K., Eckle T. Ischemia and reperfusion — from mechanism to translation. Nat. Med. 2011;17(11):1391–1401.
23. Andrienko T.N., Pasdois P., Pereira G.C. et al. The role of succinate and ROS in reperfusion injury — A critical appraisal. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2017;110):1–14.
24. Kalogeris T., Baines C.P., Krenz M., Korthuis R.J. Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2012;298):229–317.
25. Elgosbi M., Kurt A.S., Londoño M.C. et al. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion influences the immunogenicity of donor livers in humans. Liver Transpl. 2025;31(3):311–322.
26. Guarrera J.V., Henry S.D., Samstein B. et al. Hypothermic machine preservation facilitates successful transplantation of "orphan" extended criteria donor livers. Am. J. Transplant. 2015;15(1):161–169.
27. Brüggenwirth I.M.A., Lantinga V.A., Lascaris B. et al. Prolonged hypothermic machine perfusion enables daytime liver transplantation — An IDEAL stage 2 prospective clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;68. Article 102411.
28. Guarrera J.V., Estevez J., Boykin J. et al. Hypothermic machine perfusion of liver grafts for transplantation: technical development in human discard and miniature swine models. Transplant. Proc. 2005;37(1):323–325.
Review
For citations:
Novruzbekov M.S., Yaremin B.I., Balkarov A.G., Kazymov B.I., Svischeva P.O., Pavlova O.N., Khanova S.M. Evaluation of the prospects for developing a next-generation perfusion solution for hypothermic oxygenated preservation of donor organs. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2025;15(6):254–271. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2025.6.TX.3
JATS XML


















