Preview

Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH)

Advanced search

Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: study of the correlation between failure rate and the procedure technique

https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2023.3.CLIN.5

Abstract

The failure rate in arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is conditioned by irrational aligning of the drilled transosseous canals, different mechanical properties of the synthetic or auto/allografts, and the number of fixators. By now the published studies on the correlation between failure rate and methods of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction are few. The objective of this research was the investigation of the correlation between the failure rate and certain techniques of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in patients with its complete isolated rapture.

Materials and methods. The study involved 84 patients who in due time underwent single- or double-bundle reconstruction with synthetic implants, or the reconstruction by a semitendinosus and gracilis autografts. The failure rate was estimated in 3, 6, and 12 months by the presence of true clinical signs of the ACL failure along with the patient’s corresponding complaints of the knee joint instability in regular physical load.

Results. No differences were observed in the failures rates after surgeries performed by various arthroscopic reconstruction techniques in all periods of observation revealed by the interpretation of true clinical signs of ACL failure and confirmed by the Fisher's exact test value (р > 0.05) and χ2(р > 0.05) for the three groups overall.

Conclusion. The examination of patients with complete isolated ACL rapture in all periods of observation for the three samples revealed no correlation between arthroscopic ACL reconstruction failure rates and the employed techniques.

About the Authors

А. M. Shormanov
V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Anzor M. Shormanov, Traumatologist-orthopedist of the Traumatological and Orthopedic Department No. 1 of the Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery

12 B. Kazach'ya str., Saratov, 410012



V. Yu. Ulyanov
Saratov Medical University "Reaviz"
Russian Federation

Vladimir Yu. Ul'yanov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Docent, Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases

Verkhniy Rynok str., 10, Saratov, 410012



References

1. Shormanov AM, Norkin AI, Klimov SS, Chibrikova JuA, Ulyanov VYu, Bakhteeva NKh. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of various methods of anterior cruciate ligament arthroplasty in knee joint in complete rupture of the ligament. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2018;14 (2):251-259. (In Russ).

2. Simonian PT, Harrison SD, Cooley VJ, Escabedo EM, Deneka DA, Larson RV. Assessment of morbidity of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10(2):54-59.

3. Shaerf DA, Pastides P.S., Sarraf K.M., Willis-Owen C.A. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice. World J Orthop. 2014;5(1):23-29. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.23

4. Tiamklang T, Sumanont S, Foocharoen T, Laopaiboon M. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11(11):CD008413. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008413.pub2

5. Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(2):137-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.11.013

6. Kotelnikov GP, Shpigel AS. Evidence-based medicine. Samara: Samara State Medical University, 2000. 116 p. (In Russ)

7. Klimova TS, Obukhov RV. Results of arthroscopic plasty of the anterior cruciate ligament. Bulletin of the Northern State Medical University. 2009;1(22):101-102. (In Russ)

8. Zayats VV, Dulaev AK, Dydykin AV, Ul’Yanchenko IN, Kolomoitsev AV, Kovtun AV. Analysis of efficacy of arthroscopic plasty technologies of anterior cruciform ligament of knee joint based on anatomical position of autograft. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2017;176(2):77-82. (In Russ) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-77-82

9. Salikhov MR, Avramenko VV. Comparative analysis of arthroscopic techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2020;8(3):259-268. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS34050

10. Leonova SN, Monastyrev VV, Ponomarenko NS. A new approach to arthroscopic autoplasty of anterior cruciate ligament after traumatic injury. Polytrauma. 2019;(4):52-57. (In Russ).

11. Belova S.V., Gladkova E.V., Zubavlenko R.A., Ulyanov V.Yu. Systemic symptoms of primary knee osteoarthrosis in patients with the early stage of the disease. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2021;(2):71-78. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.20340/vmirvz.2021.2.CLIN.5

12. Orletskiy AK, Butkova LL, Timchenko DO. Treatment results after ACL plasty with m. semitendenous and m. gracilis tendons, and patellar ligament. N.N. Priorov journal of traumatology and orthopedics. 2011;(4):16-18. (In Russ).

13. Simagaev RO, Fomenko SM, Kiselev AS. Outcomes of surgical treatment of knee joint instability. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2016;(5): URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25175 (access 08.02.2023). (In Russ).


Review

For citations:


Shormanov А.M., Ulyanov V.Yu. Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: study of the correlation between failure rate and the procedure technique. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ" (REHABILITATION, DOCTOR AND HEALTH). 2023;13(3):58-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2023.3.CLIN.5

Views: 230


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2226-762X (Print)
ISSN 2782-1579 (Online)