Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of patients with articular manifestations of ankylosing spondyloarthritis

Objective: to substantiate the necessity of applying a multidisciplinary approach in treating patients with articular manifestations of ankylosing spondyloarthritis and to determine optimal methods of postoperative rehabilitation.
Materials and methods. A literature review was conducted on the problems of diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Modern approaches to surgical treatment of large joint involvement in this disease, including hip and knee joint replacement, were reviewed. The principles of organizing a multidisciplinary team and methods of postoperative rehabilitation were studied.
Results. Ankylosing spondylitis affects 0.5-2% of the population, predominantly men aged 15–30 years, leading to significant functional limitations and disability. The multidisciplinary approach includes participation of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, rehabilitation specialists, and other professionals for comprehensive patient care. Rheumatologists ensure disease activity control and prevention of postoperative complications. Orthopedic surgeons specialize in surgical interventions, including arthroplasty for large joint involvement. Rehabilitation specialists develop individualized recovery programs including early mobilization, physiotherapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education.
Conclusion. The multidisciplinary approach is an integral part of successful treatment of ankylosing spondyloarthritis, especially in surgical interventions on large joints. Comprehensive postoperative rehabilitation, including early mobilization, physiotherapy, and patient education, contributes to improved functional outcomes and quality of life for patients.

1. Erdes ShF, Badokin VV, Bochkova AG i dr. O terminologii spondiloartritov. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2015; 53(6): 657–60. (In Russ.)

2. Lozovoy A.A. Reabilitatsiya sportsmenov s ankiloziruyushchim spondiloartritom (bolezn'yu Bekhtereva) fizicheskoy kul'turoy. Ekonomika i upravlenie v sovremennykh usloviyakh. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya. Sost. L.M. Ashikhmina. Krasnoyarsk. 2023:120–123. (In Russ.)

3. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Listing J, Akkos N, Brandt J, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. AnnRheumDis 2009;68:777-783. https://doi.org/10.1136/фкв.2009.108233

4. Balabanova RM, Erdes ShF. The Incidence and prevalence of rheumatic diseases in Russia in 2012–2013. Nauchno–prakticheskaya revmatologiya=Rheumaology Science and Practice. 2015;53(2):120-4. (In Russ.)

5. Rudwaleit M. New approaches to diagnosis and classification of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis. CurrOpinRheumatol. 2010 Jul;22(4):375-80.

6. Petrova N. Modern approaches to determining the functional state and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, applicable in kinesitherapeutic practice. Human health, theory and methodology of physical education and sports. 2023; 1 (29): 49-53. (In Russ.)

7. Kulik N.M., Bobrik Yu.V., Moroz G.A. Novye tekhnologii fizicheskoy reabilitatsii bol'nykh ankiloziruyushchim spondiloart-ritom. Svitmeditsini ta biologii. 2014;10(2 (44)):43-46. (In Russ.)

8. ErdesShF. Recent advances and prospects of axial spondyloarthritis / ankylosing spondylitis treatment. SovremennayaRevmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2021;15(2):94–105. (In Russ.)

9. Tikhilov RM, Nikolaev NS, Shubnyakov II, Myasoedov AA, Boyarov AA, Efimov AV, Syundyukov AR. Difficulties of total hip replacement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (case report). Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2016; 22(2):70-79. (In Russ.)

10. Vander Cruyssen B., MuñozGomariz E., Font P., Mulero J., de Vlam K., Boonen A., Vazquez-Mellado J., Flores D., Vastesaeger N., Collantes E.; ASPECT-REGISPONSERRESPONDIA working group. Hip involvement in ankylosing spondylitis: epidemiology and risk factors associated with hip replacement surgery. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(1):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kep174

11. Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I., Myasoedov A.A., Pliev D.G., Karelkin V.V., Berezina G.V. Hip joint endoprosthetics for bone ankylosis of various etiologies, causes and results. Modern problems of science and education. 2018;2:1-10. (In Russ.)

12. Volchenko D.V., Akhtyamov I.F., TerskovA.Yu., Sozonov O.A., Velichko M.N., UdalovYu.D., Semenov M.S., ShpizYe.Ya., Lepsveridze L.T. Short-term results of total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (preliminary report). Geniy Ortopedii. 2021; 27(1):38-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2021-27-1-38-42

13. Al-Lami M.A.J., Emelin A.L., Akhtyamov I.F., GilmutdinovI.Sh., Abdullah A.M. Historical essays on the diagnosis and treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Practical Medicine. 2019;17(6):10-16. (In Russ.)

14. Akhtyamov I.F., Guryleva M.E., Yuosef A.I., Kovalenko A.N., Garifullov G.G., Turenkov S.V. Assessment of quality of life with hip pathology. Bulletin of Traumatology and Orthopedics. N.N. Priorova. 2007;1:37-42. (In Russ.)

15. Volchenko D.V., Kim N.I. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with injuries and diseases of the hip joint. Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University. 2005;3:54-55. (In Russ.)

16. Wong-Rieger D. Moving from patient advocacy to partnership: a long and bumpy road. Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):271-6.

17. Rumyantseva DG, ErdesShF. Axial spondyloarthritis: a current look at the concept and evolution of the disease. SovremennayaRevmatologiya=Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2019;13(4):4–10. (In Russ.)