Assessment rehabilitation efficiency of patients after acute disorder of cerebral circulation, according to the hospital register

 The widespread prevalence of acute cerebrovascular accidents (ACVA) around the world (up to 30 million annually), high disability draw close attention of doctors to the system of care for patients with strokes. Rehabilitation is of great importance in it, the main task of which is to  restore impaired body functions and return patients to a full life. The best way to organize rehabilitation is considered to be an integrated approach with the formation of a multidisciplinary team of doctors. An individual approach to each patient is also important: his age, medical history, social status, relationships with family, lifestyle. Doctors carry out rehabilitation measures to restore the patient's motor, social, household and psychoemotional functions. The results of rehabilitation and restoration of health of people who have suffered a stroke depend on many factors, but to a large extent on a favorable attitude and the persistent desire of the patients themselves to return to health. The aim of the study was, based on the results of studying the case histories of patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke of the neurological department on the basis of the BUZ UR of the First Republican Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Health of the UR, to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation of patients who underwent stroke.

1. Perrine Boursin , Sophie Paternotte , Burty Dercy , Candice Sabben , Benjamin Maïer. Semantics, epide-miology and semiology of stroke. 2018.09.

2. Belagaje SR. Stroke Rehabilitation. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2017 Feb;23(1, Cerebrovascular Disease).

3. Klamroth-Marganska V. Stroke Rehabilitation: Therapy Robots and Assistive Devices. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018.

4. Bunketorp-Käll L, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Samuelsson H, Pekny T, Blomvé K, Pekna M, Pekny M, Blomstrand C, Nilsson M. Long-Term Improvements After Multimodal Rehabilitation in Late Phase After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1916-1924.

5. Guzik A, Bushnell C. Stroke Epidemiology and Risk Factor Management. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2017 Feb;23(1, Cerebrovascular Disease):15-39.

6. Yi K, Inatomi Y, Nakajima M, Yonehara T, Ueda M. Reliability of the Modified Rankin Assessment Using a Simplified Questionnaire in Japanese. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Feb;30(2):105517.

7. Dewilde S, Annemans L, Peeters A, Hemelsoet D, Vandermeeren Y, Desfontaines P, Brouns R, Vanhooren G, Cras P, Michielsens B, Redondo P, Thijs V. Modified Rankin scale as a determinant of di-rect medical costs after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2017 Jun;12(4):392-400.

8. Wang M, Rajan SS, Jacob AP, Singh N, Parker SA, Bowry R, Grotta JC, Yamal JM. Retrospective col-lection of 90-day modified Rankin Scale is accurate. Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;17(6):637-643.

9. Wu D, Wu L, Chen J, Huber M, He X, Li S, Ding Y, Ji X. Primate Version of Modified Rankin Scale for Classifying Dysfunction in Rhesus Monkeys. Stroke. 2020 May;51(5):1620-1623.

10. Runde D. Calculated Decisions: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for Neurologic Disability. Emerg Med Pract. 2019 Jun 24.

11. Rethnam V, Bernhardt J, Johns H, Hayward KS, Collier JM, Ellery F, Gao L, Moodie M, Dewey H, Don-nan GA, Churilov L. Look closer: The multidimensional patterns of post-stroke burden behind the modi-fied Rankin Scale. Int J Stroke. 2020 Aug 27:1747493020951941.

12. Ramos-Lima MJM, Brasileiro IC, Lima TL, Braga-Neto P. Quality of life after stroke: impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Oct 8.

13. Forlander D.A., Bohannon R.W. Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date. 1999 Apr;13(2):97-100.

14. Collen F.M., Wade D.T., Robb G.F., Bradshaw C.M. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further develop-ment of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Apr-Jun 1991;13(2):50-54.

15. Hsieh C.L., Hsueh I.P., Mao H.F. Validity and responsiveness of the rivermead mobility index in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000 Sep;32(3):140-142.

16. Gabriella Antonucci,Teresa Aprile, Stefano Paolucci. Rasch analysis of the Rivermead Mobility Index: a study using mobility measures of first-stroke inpatents. 2002 Oct;83(10):1442-1449.

17. Edwards JD, Jacova C, Sepehry AA, Pratt B, Benavente OR. A quantitative systematic review of do-main-specific cognitive impairment in lacunar stroke. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3):315-322. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827deb85. PMID: 23319476; PMCID: PMC3589178.

18. Coleman ER, Moudgal R, Lang K, Hyacinth HI, Awosika OO, Kissela BM, Feng W. Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: a Narrative Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Nov 7;19(12):59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-017-0686-6. PMID: 29116473; PMCID: PMC5802378.

19. Prikaz Ministerstva zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g. № 1705n "O Poryadke organizacii medicinskoj reabilitacii". Prilozhenie № 2 Pravila opredeleniya etapov medicinskoj reabilitacii, urovnya medicinskih organizacij osushchestvlyayushchih medicinskuyu reabilitaciyu. (In Russ).